This section includes InterviewSolutions, each offering curated multiple-choice questions to sharpen your knowledge and support exam preparation. Choose a topic below to get started.
| 1051. |
Solve : new guy needs help? |
|
Answer» Hi, |
|
| 1052. |
Solve : desktop problem!? |
|
Answer» hey, hey, Did you by any CHANCE drag the My Computer icon, or any other icon situated on the desktop, out of the screen? You can CLOSE toolbars by pressing ALT + F4. You can also right click on the toolbar and select close toolbar Quote ...It is the same grey bar that appears on the left hand side of any folder you enter such as my documents in xp, and is in 3 catagories Mark: You, or another user, have opened a folder and dragged the window to the right so that part of the folder is hidden. To close the folder, click the icon at the TOP of the partially hidden window and select Close from the drop-down menu. Regards, Doc Info on this is .....the POSTER has a tiny p/c in with was given has a gift for xmas.....and has been playing up since the install of it...and as its under warentry>i suggested to the user to take it back or phone for a field engineer to pay him/her a visit to rectifiy it or replace it........as there seems to be more problems than the user posted ...this is of course mhao! |
|
| 1053. |
Solve : pc clock? |
|
Answer» well i start my computer up |
|
| 1054. |
Solve : Lots of problems.? |
|
Answer» Ok. I have some major problems. I have a windows xp with SP2 and my taskbar is glitching.First it was gone, then i learned i could bring it up when i added the address bar to it. Then whenever i minimised something it wouldn't zoom into the taskbar or even have an ICON. I have to press Alt-Control-Delete and click switch to to bring something up.
1. Try doing the following: 1. Start 2. Settings 3. Taskbar and Menu Start 4. Lock taskbar 2. Have you scanned for VIRUSES, trojan horses and spyware? 3. Reinstalling will only cause the problem to become worse. You are replacing newer files with older ones. If you want to start over, you should read this. |
|
| 1055. |
Solve : Sending a Link in IE6? |
|
Answer» Greetings: am having a problem sending links through the IE toolbar on my laptop. What exactly do you mean? You can not access webpages without it asking for a name and password? Quote
No... I'm on a webpage, and I want to send a link to the page to SOMEONE in my address book. When I click on the 'Send a Link' radio button, instead of opening up Outlook to send the link, another window opens and tells me "This secure Web Site (at [email protected]) requires me to log on. Please type the user name and password that I use for Microsoft Passport'. Then it takes me to my Hotmail account. However, only the 'Read Mail' radio button opens up my Outlook inbox. All the other options, "New Message, Send a link, and Send Page" all ask for the passport. Again, when I sign in, it opens up the Hotmail E-Mail account. I would much prefer to have Outlook Express handle these tasks... but have no idea how to set them as default. I've tried resetting IE defaults, and Outlook Express does seem to be the default mail handler. I do not use Outlook Express, nor INTERNET Explorer but I can suggest the following: 1. Start 2. Settings 3. Control Panel 4. Software 5. Program Access and Settings See to it that Outlook is set as the default E-mail client. |
|
| 1056. |
Solve : Getting back Deleted files?? |
|
Answer» Ive just DELETED a 2 Files (.ISO) and the data i extracted from this was currupt because the intallation crashed, so what i want to know does ANYONE know any software that is GOOD and FREE (Completely) which i can use to get these files back. Quote Ive just deleted a 2 Files (.ISO) and the data i extracted from this was currupt because the intallation crashed, so what i want to know does anyone know any software that is GOOD and FREE (Completely) which i can use to get these files back. Why would you wish to recover CORUPT data ? I would suggest downloading the INFO again . dl65 What no the .ISO file is file the program i extracted went currupt because i was running a ton of prgrams in the background and the intallation failed and deleted some of the filesI aint downloading a 1.1gig File again! Through Bittorent at 20KBS!So what i need to do is get the ISO file back and re-extract it then i can be on my merry way i dont think thats possible. i mean you could try a system restore back to yesterday when you had it. But it might not work like thatNo it's possible theres eDATA Unerase but it sucksI scanned with eDATA Unerase, Found! But the button Save File Isn't theretry the system restore then. do u have windows xp?Isnt Norton Ghost what all thats about?System restore is not going to bring back files that are meaningless to the operating system. You should simply redownload your Warez and stop firewalling BitTorrent.yeh i have Cheaked it out. Norton Ghost is software that can retrive files and back up your HDD for you. So go into PC WORLS and Buy that I Wouldn't complain about FREE ILLEGAL files... The key words there being FREE and ILLEGAL... Who says i'm downloading illigally?And For Your Infomation I'm Downloading Anachy Online Which is Free! |
|
| 1057. |
Solve : Explorer not running properly? |
|
Answer» Im not quite sure what started this whole problem. But whenever I turn this computer on, most of the time (95%, I am on it luckily right now) it will load up windows, for some REASON Windows Media player will come up, and then everything will dissapeara and it will just show the DESKTOP picture and I cant do anything else. It makes a sound like there is an error message, but nothing comes up on my screen. It just looks like someone went and closed explorer. How do I fix this? I have normal settings on in the msconfig window. Quote But whenever I turn this computer on, most of the time (95%, I am on it luckily right now) it will load up windows When your computer does boot properly, use the following applications: Virus scanners AVG Free -- Anti virus scanner Trend Micro Housecall -- Online anti virus scanner. Anti spy/malware Microsoft Antispyware -- Anti spyware scanner. Windows XP Home and Professional only. Spybot Search & Destroy -- Anti spyware scanner Adaware SE Personal -- Anti spyware scanner Firewalls Using only one firewall is advised. Dual firewalls may cause problems. Using a HARDWARE firewall and a software firewall is even more adviced. ZoneAlarm Free -- Free firewall - more user friendly Sygate Personal -- Free firewall - more configuration options Removal tools The following files are not substitutes for the ones described above. They are either diagnostic tools or removal tools for malware of a certain kind HijackThis -- Manual malware remover. Post the HijackThis log generated only if requested! McAfee Stinger -- Virus removal tool. No substitute for a fully FUNCTIONAL virus scanner! CWshredder -- CoolWebSearch removal tool. Widely known and persistant Hijacker. |
|
| 1058. |
Solve : everything's really big!? |
|
Answer» My little girl switched the computer on and off several times and now everything on the screen is much bigger (icons, text etc). Colours have gone all strange too. Oh, and she is not to be blamed, sometimes Windows just "dies" alone. The user is at fault 99% of the times. Computers are not meant to be used by children. If they were, they would be unbreakable.I have found the compatabilities area and experimented with each one to no avail. The screen area slider always reverts BACK to 640 x 480 no matter which variation of colors (16 colors, 256 colors or High Colors 16bit) And no matter which compatability button I select, I always get the message about having to restart the computer. Thanks for your help.Right click on desktop (in a empty area, not on a shortcut or something else); choose "Settings", then "Advanced", choose "General" (it should be already there) and see what option is selected (it should be "Apply new display settings without restarting"). After that, restart your computer and try to change again the resolution. I suppose you have Windows XP installed. Have you tried to press (many times) F8 when computer starts; a menu should appear; choose "Use last good known configuration"? Tell us what happens.Your display drivers may be corrupted, have you tried to reinstall them?Ussually, if they are corrupted, even after reinstall they will BEHAVE the same... From experience with the same type of error...Viking, should that happen again, try using the following tool: Driver Cleaner -- Removes driver remains after the uninstallation thereof. Be certain to follow the instructions carefully otherwise things will go wrong. Raptor, I have not tried to reinstall my video drivers. I don't know how to do that. What operating system is used?win98? |
|
| 1059. |
Solve : Disabling Ctrl+Alt+Del? |
|
Answer» Im running a [glb]WIN Xp [/glb] |
|
| 1060. |
Solve : Folders and Files not in alphabetical order? |
|
Answer» Until about 6 weeks back all folders and file NAMES appeared in alphabetical order when I opened a program or looked in My Documents. Now they are never in alphabetical order. Sometimes the last one USED is at the bottom and each one opened after that will go to the bottom. I can go to View, click Icons, then go back to Lists and they will be in alphabetical order until I close the program and go back to it again, then they are out of order again. The same will happen if I have them in order under List-Icons. This happens in QuickBooks, My Documents, Word, EXCEL and all other programs. It is very time consuming to find the CORRECT folder or file when I never know where it might appear. How did you file them?abcd---1234 |
|
| 1061. |
Solve : Script checher? |
|
Answer» Hi a mate of mine said when he enters a website address into Internet Explorer. He keeps getting a message popping up saying. “SCRIPTS are usually safe to use or open do you want to let the script run?” Something likes that anyway. Any help WOULD be great. Run a trojans/worm /virus scan........try trend online scan....Virus scanners |
|
| 1062. |
Solve : Windows Media Digital Playback Prob? |
|
Answer» I know that windows is touchy about DMA (I think that is what its called) Something about audio from the cd DRIVE going directly to the sound card or something. Maybe you can trying turning that on/off???I NEVER have had this problem in the past, but I don't fully recall ever copying a CD in windows media 9, so perhaps it's something freaky within the new version |
|
| 1063. |
Solve : failed verification? |
|
Answer» my COPY of widows has proved to be rejected for updates. if i download new window os is ther a WAY I can save reloding RAID etc FIRST of all, what OS are you using now and what are you planning to upgrade to? my copy of widows has proved to be rejected for updates. if i download new window os is ther a way I can save reloding raid etc I will ASSUME that your product key bounced. This is due to the fact your product was allready downloaded and thus, illegal. |
|
| 1064. |
Solve : Secure web site access? |
|
Answer» Hi all |
|
| 1065. |
Solve : Re-install Windows? |
|
Answer» Hello everyone. I have a computer thats a few years old and is a Windows XP. I've had it for awhile it is barely still alive because of all the junk thats on it. It is so slow its sad. My family just recieved a new Window's XP Home Edition from the insurance COMPANY cause all of ours cd's got stolen. I was wondering if there is any way I could delete windows and EVERYTHING off the computer and then re-install Windows xp Home Edition on it to where it wold be like new. if any one has any INFORMATION, it would be very very helpful. THANK you!!! |
|
| 1066. |
Solve : Generic Host Process for Win32 Services...? |
|
Answer» Last night when we go home...We started up our computer (XP) and once logged on, got a "send error report" message. The problem was with "Generic Host Process for Win 32 Services" D.E.L.L= dont exactly live long Lmao...I will have to keep that in mind Quote The following article may be of use: Great Work, Raptor! Quote App name App version Module name Module version Offset Those were one of the specific errors I recieved. Quote CAUSE *looks over at printer* *sees an HP* *Rolls Eyes thinking "another download"* Thanks Raptor! Thanks Merlin! I will try updating drivers, and do what it says... Good luck! Be certain to follow the instructions provided by HP when uninstalling and reinstalling the drivers.Thanks! I am...I just went looking around, and found the original driver disc, and installation instructions. I am currently looking for updated drivers. |
|
| 1067. |
Solve : Desktop Image Migrating?? |
|
Answer» It's not really a big deal, but it caused a ruckus in the office AMONG the some of the people here who thought we'd been hacked and the sky was falling. |
|
| 1068. |
Solve : Self-Expansion?!? |
|
Answer» Does anyone know why Windows sometimes automatically expand in disk size? I installed it awhile ago and although I installed and saved everything else on my other hard drive, the one it is on keeps on saying its full (3GB, what do you expect). Sorry about that! It's Windows XP. The main reasons Windows XP requires a lot of Hard Disk Drive space are:
Reserve at least 10GB for Windows XP to be on the safe side.Arrrgh... I'm trying to reinstall it on the other hard drive which is a lot bigger, but it won't LET me or something. Do I have to get rid of this copy first and if I do, how so? Downgrade and then upgrade it? Quote Arrrgh... I'm trying to reinstall it on the other hard drive which is a lot bigger, but it won't let me or something. Do I have to get rid of this copy first and if I do, how so? Downgrade and then upgrade it? You can not move Windows XP to another Hard Disk Drive. Reformatting is one of the few options you have. |
|
| 1069. |
Solve : putting desktop icons in system tray for win xp no? |
|
Answer» My lady friend has a windows notebook xp & i'd like to know if she can put those desktop icons in the system tray? she WANTS to ENJOY her desktop PICS. a friend of mine did it for my win ME tower. thanks,cyberYou could always do a R-clic on the desktop, |
|
| 1070. |
Solve : Boot Disk Failure? |
|
Answer» Please could you help i have been given a tiny computer to fix it is running on MILLENIUM os. as of yet i can not get into anything i,ve tried to get into safemode but it just goes back to the same screen saying boot disk failure insert system disk, which i do not have, is there any way i can get into safemode other than pressing f8 or ctrl.I think that you need to find an ME boot disk file on the internet. Try booting using the disk. I know of no other way of GETTING into safe mode. Quote Please could you help i have been given a tiny computer to fix it is running on millenium os. as of yet i can not get into anything i,ve tried to get into safemode but it just goes back to the same screen saying boot disk failure insert system disk, which i do not have, is there any way i can get into safemode other than pressing f8 or ctrl. If safe mode does not work, the installation of Windows is most likely damaged. Try selecting the last known good configuration instead.Please could you advise how to get to the last known configuration, as i can not get past the screen with boot disk failure on it. Please help. Quote Please could you advise how to get to the last known configuration, as i can not get past the screen with boot disk failure on it. Please help. The good last known configuration option will not be available when you encounter a boot disk failure first. Be certain that HDD 0 is set as the first boot device in the BIOS. This is what you usually SEE when the hard drive has failed and is what happened to my hard drive when I was using Millennium Edition. How old is the computer? Can you boot to a bootdiskette A:\> prompt and use fdisk or dir /p to see any files on the drive? You can download an ME OEM bootdisk image from... BOOTDISKS You'll have to download it to another computer's hard-drive (not directly to a floppy) and then double-click on the file with a clean formatted floppy in the A: drive. And this will help you retrieve the ProductKey IF you can read the drive. You can then put it into your computer's A: drive and start up. When you get to the first screen choose Minimal Boot and press Enter. At the prompt type: A:\>EDIT C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM.DAT , The file will open, then use the keyboard Alt, Arrow & Enter keys to get to EDIT on the top of the file, then Arrow down to FIND, type in - ProductKey - press Enter, and make a note of the number: It will look like: XXXXX-XXXXX-XXXXX-XXXXX-XXXXX Hi, THANK you for your reply, i have tried this but it says that it cannot find a match so i was unable to find the key number. Any other SUGGESTIONS. Do you think i need to get a new Hard drive they have had the computer a while. Please advise. Regards LisaHi, Just found the product key number on the side of the computer what do i do now. Quote Hi, Could you create a new topic and explain your problem? |
|
| 1071. |
Solve : Clearing the Hard Drive? |
|
Answer» Alright... so I am working with a pretty screwed up computer right now. It is running Win98. I have made back-up copies of all the Word and Excel files on floppies and now I think I want to flatten the hard drive... clear it all and start from new. How do I do this? Detailed instructions would be GREAT.... in easy to understand terms haha. ThanksNitro: |
|
| 1072. |
Solve : weird virus question??? |
|
Answer» Is it possible that some type of virus can hide somewhere other than on the HARD drive of a single hard drive computer?
1. Flash Bios 2. Additional information and help with BIOS updates However, the issue should not be sought there. I was merely answering your question, not providing a hint. |
|
| 1073. |
Solve : Windows XP cannot boot straightly? |
|
Answer» My Windows XP did not boot straightly it show a error message " We Apologize for the inconvenience, but windows did not start successfully. A recent hardware or software change might have caused this...". Please help me guys. Thanks a lot.Check for problems in your Device Manager. " We Apologize for the inconvenience, but windows did not start successfully. A recent hardware or software change might have caused this..." That does not at all sound as a legitimate error message. Have you downloaded FILES that could have been infected? Can you enter safe mode?Larry: Yeah, i've seen that one a few times. That's Windows XP's new "kinder, gentler" way of displaying a blue screen of death (BSOD). Did you recently add a new expansion card, new drive, or install a new program? One thing you may try is to boot to the Last Known Good Configuration. When you start your computer, just before the error message, keep pressing the F8 key till you see a menu of boot options. You will see Safe Mode and Last Known Good Configuration. The last known good config is a copy of the registry Windows made the last time it successfully booted. Choose that option and see if your computer starts successfully. Let us KNOW if it does not. Regards, Doc Thanks guys for the REPLIES. Yeah i'll try all the options (Safe Mode, Last Known Good Config & Start Normally) But there's no happen. I'll try "Start Normally and Last know good config" go to Windows XP logo and after it will reset and goto the option again. That's the routine did not go to the windows successfully. I'll try the "Safe Mode" it display a log files or something then hang the computer. I can't format because my important files is there. What can i do guys. Pls. help me again. Thanks a lot.Try repairing your installation of Windows Xp. How to perform an in-place UPGRADE (REINSTALLATION) of Windows XPError message is! |
|
| 1074. |
Solve : need major help? |
|
Answer» hey everyone, |
|
| 1075. |
Solve : HELP Windows Not Being Displayed? |
|
Answer» ploease help i am at the end of my tether |
|
| 1076. |
Solve : Windows ME Help file won't open?? |
|
Answer» Can anyone HELP me wiith this problem? When I try to open help file from start MENU or try to open system info files. I get this error message:unable to open help file error 2147143677 help control center has failed. I have tryed solutions from btinternet.com but with no luck. Any solutions to this problem would be appreciated. THANK YOU, Mark Windows ME Help & Support uses INTERNET Explorer so it is most probably a problem with IE. Have you changed anything to do with IE lately? |
|
| 1077. |
Solve : Restore System to factory defaults? |
|
Answer» I was wondering if someone could answer a question for me. I want to RESTORE my PC to the factory settings, the way it was when I first got it. Remove everything that isn't needed, and just be the "clean." |
|
| 1078. |
Solve : physical memory dump when starting win xp? |
|
Answer» i'm getting a physical memory dump when i start win xp. i cannot get into windows after this happens. is my memory bad?Windows Memory Diagnostic |
|
| 1079. |
Solve : My sound just goes away until i reboot? |
|
Answer» I have the Gateway Media center AthlonXP64 3500+ and have owned it 4 weeks now, out of the 4 weeks, i guess 6 times the sound just goes out, I do not have to be on the computer for it to do this, and if I restart then as soon as the computer is shutting off before the restart you can hear the windows sound it makes shutting down and booting up, or I can just PRESS the sleep button, it does not go on mute and i checked the device manager and all showed to be ok, can any body help with this?This could be a hardware problem, and not a problem with windows. Have you tried contacting gateway? Thanks for the reply, yes Gateway SAID it was nothing i should worry about and to restore my computer back before the problem started, did that, but I still can not help but to worryHa, It sounds they have CRAPPY CUSTOMER support. |
|
| 1080. |
Solve : Device Manager list incomplete? |
|
Answer» My PCs has 6 USB ports. All work but Device Manager onlyu shows 5. Any idea why? |
|
| 1081. |
Solve : Toolbar issue? |
|
Answer» The application tags on the toolbar at the bottom of the screen that allow you to jump between applications/web pages are gone. I can only utilize one application - IE I can not bounce between Micrsoft Money and a web site. I hope this is just some set up issue that will be easy to fix. Thanks for any help.Are you referring to the taskbar? now I'm thinking virus. Virus scanners AVG Free -- Anti virus scanner Anti spy/malware Microsoft Antispyware -- Anti spyware scanner. Windows XP Home and Professional only. Spybot SEARCH & Destroy -- Anti spyware scanner Adaware SE Personal -- Anti spyware scanner Firewalls Using only one firewall is advised. Dual firewalls may cause problems. Using a hardware firewall and a software firewall is even more adviced. ZoneAlarm Free -- Free firewall - more user friendly Sygate Personal -- Free firewall - more configuration options Removal tools The following files are not substitutes for the ones described above. They are either diagnostic tools or removal tools for malware of a certain kind HijackThis -- Manual malware remover. Post the HijackThis log generated only if requested! McAfee Stinger -- Virus removal tool. No substitute for a fully functional virus scanner! CWshredder -- CoolWebSearch removal tool. Widely KNOWN and persistant Hijacker.Boot pc and HOLD down the f8 key and chose the last good config from the list... |
|
| 1082. |
Solve : Syncjit Compiler not found. Will use Interpreter? |
|
Answer» What the heck does this warning MEAN? My friend keeps getting this warning on her computer every time it opens. She is a computer "phobic" and comes to me with her PROBLEMS. I'm not THAT smart, but I TRY to help her. This warning is driving us both crazy! |
|
| 1083. |
Solve : I am having big problems installing a 200 GB Hard Drive.? |
|
Answer» I have installed a few hard drives before. I am thinking to myself that I shouldn't be having this problem. Here are my problems. I have a Pentium 4 computer. The hard drive currently in it is simply too small. So I elected to install a 200 GB HD. I am using Windows XP Prof. The HD is from Western Digital. I am installing Windows Xp as a completely NEW OS. The BIOS sees the HD just fine, and the XP installation seems to be going well with out any problems. When I get to the part during the installation about partitioning this 200 GB drive the only size that Windows will recognize is 14245 MB. I am trying for an NTFS PARTITION. I can try to change this amount , but it will not accept any changes to a HIGHER amount. So my capacity is roughly 17.5 MB out of 200 GB. |
|
| 1084. |
Solve : Installing xp on compaq 2500 have disc but keeps shutting down? |
|
Answer» Hallo everyone, I'm new to this kind of thing so apologies in advance if I bugger it up. I was given a COMPAQ 2500 notebook with some "issues" so I thought I'd try reinstalling XP to wipe it clean and remove all the other persons stuff. I was a little worried about using my xp disc from the old HP desktop but did it anyway. The normal screens CAME up and it asked if I wanted to delete the partition which I did because there was not enough room to install XP on a new partition and it looked to be loading but then it got to the end and said it couldn't start and shut down. Now when I try to reboot I get an error message saying invalid boot ini FILE then next... following file corrupt: |
|
| 1085. |
Solve : Unwanted change in file association for TXT? |
|
Answer» Something keeps TRYING to change file ASSOCIATIONS for TXT I have set to my favourite Text Editor. I keep being told by WINPATROL that it has been changed BACK to Notepad - do I want to allow that ? How can I stop the reversal PROCESS ? |
|
| 1086. |
Solve : temporary profile becomes default? |
|
Answer» Hi |
|
| 1087. |
Solve : ASUS Motherboard Make Disk for DOS Menu. No "a" drive, but comp. says yes.? |
|
Answer» I don't have an "a" floppy drive. I have installed a new hard drive, (only one in system) put XP on it and have now begun the motherboard installation. I bought an external floppy drive, thinking that this would help the installation. I am assuming that I don't need the "NVIDIA RAID Driver Page" nor the "JMicron JMB36X RAID Driver Page," which leaves me with the FreeDOS command prompt. Upon choosing that, I am faced with: Reassign the drive to A. Stop please... |
|
| 1088. |
Solve : Delayed Write Failed? |
|
Answer» Says WINDOWS - Delayed WRITE Failed each time i startup computer xp pro. How do i fix? Do you have any external DRIVE connected through USB?Yes a usb FLASH drive & i turned off enable write also Off which both didn't work, now what? was it because i left hd unplugged too long? Because was trying out 2 other hd's Quote from: hmsam on December 16, 2010, 08:11:01 AM Off which both didn't work, now what? was it because i left hd unplugged too long? Because was trying out 2 other hd's DLoad and run the Free diagnostics from the drive manuf. site....run the long test....let it run to completion...don't get impatient. Post your results later. Quote usb flash driveFlash drive, or hard drive? |
|
| 1089. |
Solve : Does Windows XP Handel gaming better than Vista/7? |
|
Answer» I have alot of games on the shelf and it shows that it takes less system resources when you run the game with XP. But I have always ran them with vista. Would I see any increase in performance if I ran these games on XP? Quote from: johngetter on December 09, 2010, 07:56:36 PM I have alot of games on the shelf and it shows that it takes less system resources when you run the game with XP. But I have always ran them with vista. Would I see any increase in performance if I ran these games on XP? No. http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,2845,2302499,00.asp http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/amd_nvidia_windows_vista_driver_performance_update/page3.asp Quote from: BC_Programmer on December 09, 2010, 08:07:17 PM No. Oh ok thanks. Just wanted to know.I didn't think you believed in those benchmark sites, BC_Programmer. I've used all three, from what I can see WinXP SP3 still outperforms Vista SP2 and yes even Win7 in most first person shooter games. I perfer Win7 for pretties and DirectX10, but was horrified it still dropped fps (DirectX9 only games). If using DirectX10 and the newer graphic cards which support it however, that's another story, the graphic card will boost the performance up using it's hardware. Vista is slower than XP, even with all the bells and whistles turned off, and it still goobles up almost twice the amount of memory doing it - loading everything, once for system RAM and then copies that to graphic card RAM. Maybe that's just my personal experience with benchmarking them with the same games on the same hardware... and the 100,000s of other's on the net. I thought Win7 would outperform it too, but nope. I would suggest, older systems and directx9 graphic cards = stick with WinXP SP3, anything newer upgrade to Win7 for future proofing, networking, multitasking and pretties. If your got Vista, highly recommend replacing it with Win7 Ultimate - it's Vista without half the mess.ignore the above post. Quote from: BC_Programmer on December 10, 2010, 12:38:53 AM ignore the above post. Yeah okFeel free to ignore and while your being bios... Quote Although it’s been common knowledge among computer professionals for some time, there is now official research that proves that Windows new Vista operating system is slower and less responsive than Windows XP. The Florida-based development and research company, Devil Mountain Software, compared performance benchmarks between the two operating systems. The end result? Windows XP outperformed Vista in every single test. This is with Vista having 2GB and WinXP having only 1GB to run with. The tests also showed that Vista “locked up” most additional memory added to a computer. This means that by upgrading a laptop from 1 GB to 2 GB of RAM, researchers were only able to improve Vista’s performance by 4%! Benchmarks all depend on your hardware for end results. Vista is considered a hog, it would gooble up your system. If you don't have the resources it will struggle (low spec computers should stick with WinXP), if you do have the money for more memory and processing and graphic card memory, then it's still throwing it to a bit of waste (Win7 has a reduced thumbprint), but by all means, simply ignore that and it will run. Maybe when I wasn't looking they patched up Vista for free to Win7 anyways to get rid of all the issues?You are truly an idiot. I'm not even going to bother responding to that because I already have in numerous other posts. Quote from: johngetter on December 09, 2010, 07:56:36 PM I have alot of games on the shelf and it shows that it takes less system resources when you run the game with XP. But I have always ran them with vista. Would I see any increase in performance if I ran these games on XP? Is this the computer that has the one gig of RAM that you were wanting to upgrade to two gigs? Did you buy the new RAM yet? I'd recommend at least two gigs for vista. What kind of computer is it? Have you checked to see if there are xp drivers available for your machine? Quote from: BC_Programmer on December 11, 2010, 07:40:13 PM You are truly an idiot. BC_P, you beat me to it. You can truly blindsided BS_Programmer and Trout well he would follow you off a cliff thinking it's a great idea just because you said so. What 'JJ3000' said is what people should be looking at before even thinking of upgrading to Vista. Granted most newer computers will handle Vista no problems but why bother when you can now get Win7 which is a patched up version of their completely premature, memory hog of a OS. If you don't take my word, why not ask Microsoft themselves. They have already admited Vista was a complete failure and moved on. Quote from: Azzaboi on December 12, 2010, 04:48:28 PM They have already admited Vista was a complete failureDocument that please.ironically, "Devil Mountain software" is just the fictitious some idiot uses to name his blog. I could just as well say that "BASeCamp Corporation" performed a similar test and found that the results were quite the opposite. In every single case, Vista ran faster. from http://makfu.wordpress.com/2010/02/22/screw-you-randall-c-kennedy-and-idg/ Quote So now it’s all out in the open: Randall C. Kennedy is pathological liar who created a fake persona in the form of one Craig Barth, CTO of Devil Mountain Software. These are He is the clowns clown who claimed that Server 2008 performed substantially better than Windows Vista SP1 despite the fact that they are two editions of THE SAME OPERATING SYSTEM! Kennedy is also the fool who, after making asinine assertions about Windows Vista and Win7 thread counts on his InfoWorld blog, proceeded to embarrass himself in an online debate with Thom Holwerda (of OSNEWS.COM) that highlighted what a know-nothing blowhard he was. Quote from: Azzaboi on December 12, 2010, 04:48:28 PM You can truly blindsided BS_Programmer and Trout well he would follow you off a cliff thinking it's a great idea just because you said so.your ability to troll is unsurpassed by anybody, save maybe slashdotters. Quote What 'JJ3000' said is what people should be looking at before even thinking of upgrading to Vista. Granted most newer computers will handle Vista no problems but why bother when you can now get Win7 which is a patched up version of their completely premature, memory hog of a OS.Why bother upgrading at all? Windows 98 works for Excel, Word, and Office applications. Most people upgrade because they have more demanding applications, mostly games. Here's a surprise, a LOT of newer games are being written exclusively for DX10. And as I already proved, you can't get DX10 running on XP. Although I find that whole debate pointless. Idiots with no clue like to say "I'm running Crysis in DX10 mode and Ultra High" Well, obviously if they are just running it through the wrapper, most of the functions are probably just stubs, so you get no damned advantage. They keep saying it like it's a good thing, Christ, I don't understand why people weren't eager to backport DX 9.0c to Windows 98SE in the same fashion. Vista, at a glance, should run games slower then XP; and this is true, if you're running a 7 or 8 year old system. Vista has to translate DX9 and previous games (in a way) so that it supports the new driver engine (this very same engine that idiotic morons like to pretend doesn't exist); however, at the same time, it has better RAM manipulation and deals with the system more effectively (the new kernel that the new driver engine happens to interface with, also). It's like those dumbasses saying that games run slower with Aero On then with Aero of, which doesn't make any sense since windows shuts off aero when you start a full-screen application, so obviously they are just making shite up, which is pretty par for the course. Windows XP did NOT because the fan favourite instantly. There were holdouts for years holding onto Windows 98SE and refusing to upgrade to XP because.... wait for it... wait for it... It was better for gaming! The similiarities here amuse me. A bunch of random tards who are sticking to an old OS for no real reason other then their hate of change (And don't PULL the old "OMG new OS's need so much morez RAM" because people pull that *censored* with every OS release, Some people even make up companies and purport their data as the truth, and then morons will use those entirely invented facts as if they are true. despite the fact that they simply don't understand the basic concepts involved) If you don't want to use a lot of RAM, run CP/M. I'd explain what that is but I'm SURE you either already have or are forming yet another gargantuan conspiracy theory involving microsoft "stealing" CP/M or some other false nonsense. You can even find sites that express that. The only thing that finally convinced them to switch to XP was newer games looking a *censored* of a lot better and working a lot faster, or simply requiring, DX9, which wasn't available for windows 98 (because of the evil bill, obviously). I also love how people who probably pirated the OS, or bought it 7 years ago (which would translate to like a 10th of a cent a day) still think that MS owes them something as collosal an engineering undertaking as backporting a hardware/software interface that currently communicates using a new driver architecture to a totally new kernel back to a 7 year old operating system that they had forked from long before they had even considered the design implications of DX10. Come on, you used the OS you bought for 7 years. And if you pirated it, you're just a self-indulgent douche anyway and your demands are both unrealistic and not worth their time. Quote If you don't take my word, why not ask Microsoft themselves. They have already admited Vista was a complete failure and moved on.No they didn't. a few employees expressed an opinion. Most of whom were probably on teams totally unrelated to windows development. I just love how people seem to think that everybody working there works on everything. One afternoon somebody might be working on office, and the next a kernel mode keyboard driver. That's not the way it works, obviously. For all we know those people were on one of the office teams, or even one of the teams that works on mac software. Quote from: Azzaboi on December 12, 2010, 04:48:28 PM Trout well he would follow you off a cliff thinking it's a great idea just because you said so. No, it's just that we both happen, independently, to think that you are abusive language deleted by Allan and warning issuedAzzaboi: All people are asking for is proof. Not opinion. Not hearsay. Not confabulation. Proof. If you can't provide proof, don't sell it as 100% fact. Anyone can claim "I tried this and I can confirm that..." While that, in of itself, is not bad, it should be taken as it is: a claim. For example (and I'll throw myself under the bus for a minute--not the first time I've done so ), I've posted my own results from freezing hard drives to recover data. I've even stated that I didn't know whether or not my positive results were simply correlation or that it could potentially work. As BC mentioned in a rebuttal to my claims, he mentioned that modern hard drives and their liquid bearings would not show any positive result from this, as the bearings could freeze and actually prohibit movement! Others have claimed that their results work (possibly on older drives without liquid bearings), but again...they're just that: claims. Should they be taken as absolute fact that it works? No. Should it be taken as "anyone who says it works is completely full of ____?" Only if they try to sell it as 100% fact. It should be taken as is: a claim. Obviously, I can't reproduce my "positive results" as easily on every drive with mechanical problems. If I had enough older hard drives with mechanical problems to play around with, I'd do some more experimenting myself (and probably post the results on Youtube or something). Worst case scenario, I would have ended up destroying several older drives that I don't care about (and let people know not to do this based on this). Best case, I could get some data back from all of them (provided that they have the same mechanical problem, they don't use liquid bearings, and that I've taken all necessary precautions to avoid having condensation form on the drives themselves), and put some disclaimer of "do at your own risk" alongside it. In your case: anyone can claim that Vista and 7 are slower than XP. How many of them are willing to go through the trouble of having 2-3 PCs with identical hardware running the different operating systems with multiple benchmarks (both synthetic and real-world) to make an honest comparison? Obviously the guys at the various benchmark sites have this luxury. Benchmark sites are fine...as long as you're willing to use the articles as intended and not "cherry pick" statements from it to try and sell a point. Multiple benchmark sites would be better, as people can fact-check against those (as well as what they know) and make their own informed decision. Unlike the hard drive freezing example, your claim can easily be tested against and confirmed/refuted without a whole lot of effort. If you continue to post anything short of this while trying to sell your point, ignoring evidence that contradicts your point, then you're simply trolling--POSTING only to solicit negative responses and start conflict. |
|
| 1090. |
Solve : Background Processing? |
|
Answer» Sometime it so happens that when we install some type of software, although we R not working on that PARTICULAR software, but our COMPUTER continues to process it steady WITHOUT visibility. |
|
| 1091. |
Solve : How to turn off an annoying sound in XP? |
|
Answer» Greetings, I found the "default beep" entry but don't know how to change it to a silent WAV file.... You have to create one Start sound recorder (Start->Run sndrec32 or Start->All Programs->Accessories->Entertainment->Sound Recorder) Then you can Save the 0-length sound somewhere; in my test I saved it as C:\empty.wav for example. Then change the default beep entry by selecting "Browse.." and choosing the empty wav file. You can assign it to whichever items you want to be silent. Most other sounds other then the default beep entry respect when you have cleared the sound (for the "Navigation Complete" for example, you should be able to just say "none" and you won't hear it anymore) Good day, Just wanted to thank you for your help. Problem fixed. Also to thank all who have helped me in the past and got me out of some STICKY situations. Much appreciated. Wonderful site and people who assist therein. Gracias, SampYou're Welcome, may your computing experience remain forever beepless! |
|
| 1092. |
Solve : DDRAW.DLL? |
|
Answer» This problem happens with my son first i make malware scan : no problem What scans did you run ? ? 1 -Kaspersky Internet SECURITY 2011 2-SUPERAntiSpywareDLoad install and run Malwarebytes anti-malware... Reboot after...Do these programs work with each other without conflict Kaspersky Internet Security 2011 -- SUPERAntiSpyware---Malwarebytes yes... as long as only 1 is running at any given time. The problem is ended. I work scanning by Malwarebytes .There are some infected files . and make update for Video drivers thank you patio & Salmon Trout Good to hear your FIXED up... |
|
| 1093. |
Solve : Two Cookies (temp files) Wont delete fix?? |
|
Answer» Hello Everyone, I have these two cookies that will not delete even in Safe Mode and Ccleaner dont work EITHER. anyone know how to delete these two>>> |
|
| 1094. |
Solve : Windows XP - Uses? |
|
Answer» Does ANYONE know how many times I can install Windows XP Home Edition on a computer? Does anyone know how many times I can install Windows XP Home Edition on a computer? Hey, Flame: The only time you may run into a problem is if you have made a major hardware CHANGE (like swapping out the motherboard). The database at the Microsoft website may think this is a different computer and not let you register the operating system. If this happens, you may still call Microsoft to register via the phone. The phone number is displayed on the registration splash screen. Regards, Doc Thanks Doc! [glb]Flame[/glb] |
|
| 1095. |
Solve : problems installing a 64 bit OS? |
|
Answer» I'm having problems installing a 64 bits OS on a newly build pc. |
|
| 1096. |
Solve : Laptop BIO info? |
|
Answer» I TRYING to get the BIO info for my laptop to get on a VLAN network but I cannot get into Windows XP Professional or the MOS DOS command prompt to enter "Ipconfig/all" to get the info.Why cant you get in? What happens? |
|
| 1097. |
Solve : Windows can not load the locally stored profile? |
|
Answer» I've been searching ONLINE all day for solutions to this problem and NEED help. |
|
| 1098. |
Solve : Screensaver won't start? |
|
Answer» I posted this once before, but I'm trying again. My screensaver in XP stops COMING on, for no apparent reason. I know that cordless mice sometimes cause this problem, but I'm not using one. I never have a problem GETTING it started again - just go into Desktop Properties and make some kind of CHANGE and click Apply. And it'll last for a few hours, coming on after a couple of minutes like it's supposed to. But then I'll do some work, leave the MACHINE, and notice later that the screensaver never started up again. It seems to happen randomly, not after I close out of any particular application.What applications are running in the background? Some programs may force the screensaver to be disabeled whilst operating. |
|
| 1099. |
Solve : slowlly computer? |
|
Answer» what can i do with a slow computer HO have windows xp profesional programs instaled.what setting and step to coud make the best performance for this. The minimum recommended requirements for the original version of WinXP Pro is 128MB and is said to be able to manage on 64MB, however more memory would of cause be highly recommended.The Minimum requirements were also conceived when XP was released. that was 9 years ago. Programs are a lot heavier then they used to be. Quote You can run (third party) WinXP Lite or Gamer's Edition OS happily on 64MB or 128MB with good performance. All that WinXP Lite is, is a stripped down version. Rather than purchasing something like WinXP Lite (http://www.litepc.com/xplite.html), I just gave a few options to tweak with what your've got on XP Pro.Any XP "modification" like "Lite" or "Gamer's Edition" are illegal and against the EULA. Quote This would depend on what your planning to use those computers for, latest games or graphical applications would still need much more system resources (1GB min recommended for games). However, if your just word processing and doing simple applications, etc, I don't see any harm. No. If they want a faster computer they should get more RAM. Actually you know what, what the *censored*, I'll go through each of your points. Quote Reduce resolutionThis will only matter if the computer was manufacturered/released around about 1992, before 2-D graphics accelerators became standard. Otherwise, it just makes things look crappy for no reason. Resolution is entirely dependent on the graphics card. So is colour depth. Actually, running at 16-bit colour will reduce performance, not increase it. Quote Reducing effects for performanceAgain, Almost all of those are Graphics card-dependent. And- again- unless that graphics card is ancient it's GOING to support the basic 2-D device caps required for those effects. (A ATI Rage Pro 3D for example doesn't have the proper Alpha-blending caps to make the "fancy" selection box work as smooth, so windows uses the processor for it, but otherwise if the graphics card is doing the work you aren't going to be speeding it up by any large margin. This is particularly the case with XP which doesn't take advantage of hardware acceleration beyond a few basic 2-D functions, so the GPU is usually sitting there doing squat half the time. Quote Remove indexing service (for quick search)This be true. Mostly because the indexing service is almost never used (unlike Vista and 7 which have it on the start menu); and most people search using that find files applet which works with it but only finds half of what you're looking for. Upgrade Quote If you haven't already, ensure you update the computer to Service Pack 3 and have the latest updates. This is more stable, more secure *cough* for microsoft standards, and has slightly better performance.SP3 is not faster then SP2. Nonetheless they should have it, though. Quote Personally I think disk defragmenter is a waste of time. And I ran XP in a K6-2 350Mhz and 96MB of RAM so I do indeed speak from experience that it speeds up nothing. Nor do any of the reported "speed tweaks". Re the "Service" tweaks. people who think that disabling as many services as possible speeds up the machine are plain and simple idiots. Of course disabling some services may increase performance, but that's because that service is no longer providing it's function. if the service wouldn't have been doing anything to BEGIN with, it won't even be loaded. Sure, it will show started, it's DLLMain will execute and it's Service Startup callback will be invoked, but unless the service actually needs to perform it's service it will almost always be swapped out to disk, not consuming memory nor CPU power. The fact that people seem to believe otherwise is because they misunderstand the basic premise of what a "background" task is. Quote Disable Prefetch for low memory systems, if system only has about 128megs of RAM. Not recommended to disable if you can get more memory (prefetching can speed up most used applications startup time), but since your very limited and don't want any hogs. Preloading programs could be sucking away your available RAM...prefetch doesn't use Memory on windows XP. Mostly because it's a boot only process as well as during logon. Application prefetch data is stored in a centralized location that I'm sure you're aware of because you no doubt buy the "tip" that you should clear it out to speed up the machine. Quote Shutdown faster...All those settings are there for a good reason. They'll only speed up shutdown if for some reason a program hangs, or if a program was left open. Thankfully your little tweak there solves both problems and ends the second task automatically after two seconds. Even though it did in fact see the System shutdown and was prompting "do you want to save". Goodbye data. Quote what can i do with a slow computer ho have windows xp profesional programs instaled.what setting and step to coud make the best performance for this.? Given you were able to install a win xp on your current hardware specs., a RAM upgrade is the best approach. Although its quite unclear what you mean about Quote they have 128 ram memory capacities? The OP might have 2,3 or 4 of those. Without much information, its quite confusing. |
|
| 1100. |
Solve : Problem with System (High Mem Usage)? |
|
Answer» Hello I see nothing alarming in those numbers myself...meabe, but my computer ir slow..Exactly WHAT is slow? Define your problem clearly please. Quote from: Allan on December 19, 2010, 06:36:14 AM Exactly WHAT is slow? Define your problem clearly please. slow all operations, opening the folder, My computer or Mozilla Firefox and so on. Meabe, reason is driver's chipset ?What is new or different since the last time everything worked properly (ie, new hw, new sw, virus, error, ETC)?nothing is new or different.. What do you think it's not normal this MEM USAGE is to high ?Are you saying that one day the system just STARTED performing slowly or was it gradual? How does it perform in Safe Mode?when I reinstall windows then I intall drivers and software then.. in safe mode computer is fast " http://img109.imageshack.us/img109/9052/eeerrorr.jpg " system MEM USAGE is not using high...Whoa, let's go back to the beginning. This is the first time you mentioned reinstalling Windows. Tell us the whole story - EVERYTHING that happened, EVERYTHING you did - including which drivers you installed. Quote from: edzha90 on December 19, 2010, 07:45:34 AM nothing is new or different.. Apparently there is something new or different...I uninstall AVG Antivirus 2010 and System Usage MEM disappeared. Thanks all, for help! No problem. We'll see you soon in the malware forum. Quote from: Allan on December 20, 2010, 05:57:12 AM No problem. We'll see you soon in the malware forum.Ha!, assuming he doesn't install some other anti-virus program. Quote from: edzha90 on December 20, 2010, 03:25:11 AM I uninstall AVG Antivirus 2010 and System Usage MEM disappeared.So, do you have any anti-virus program installed now? |
|