1.

Solve : The underdog?

Answer»

Winme five years old.........winxp five years old........

I stuck with the underdog.......winme.....and the win2k/xp/2003..........will now find out what the have let themselves in for........a nice headache ......the ....will hit the fan......

I have tried them all........including longhorn now renamed vista.......or is it visa........I can understand your reluctance to use XP but what do you find wrong with w2k?same  as winxp......less system msconfig/system.restore......

Have you compared the file system......seems the same.it is.Don't forget..... less activation/validation.  Hey guy i dont have any probs with my windows XP!

But ME did run faster...

R0SSFWIW Win2K will run on FAT32 or NTFS...

patio.  Thanks for letting us know you're using the crappiest Windows edition to ever hit the stores.

If you have no problems with Windows ME, you probably keep your PC turned off 24/7,

Stop trying to brag about how good you are with something worthless and instead, put time in learning how to spell!

Quote

But ME did run faster...
 


No, you just did not maintain your PC properly or you tried to install Windows XP on the same MACHINE you installed Windows ME on. On a heavily outdated machine, that is.

Quote
Have you compared the file system......seems the same.it is.


And your point is?

Windows 98 used FAT32. So does Windows ME. So why not go back directly to Windows 98? Because you just like to ramble on about matters of small or no relevance. These kind of people OFTEN get to hear the following phrase: Get a life.

Quote
I have tried them all........including longhorn now renamed vista.......or is it visa........


Windows 98's codename was Chicago. Welcome to the club, ME probably had a code name as well. What exactly is your point here? None? Thought so.Raptor you must be high on Crack.

No i bought a new computer and it came with XP my ME PC went to tip.

R0SS

Actually, I must'nt be.

Windows XP loads slower because it has a lot more services that need to be started.

Oh, by the way, XP can boot in less than 10 seconds and shut down in less than 2. But that does require a lot of tweaking.

really?

the new Vista clam it will be 50x faster at booting and closing down.

R0SSMy point if ......you are interested is the user is loosing control over the pc.........and now its disappearing...... Quote
really?

the new Vista clam it will be 50x faster at booting and closing down.

R0SS


And that relates to Windows XP being faster than you claim it is .. How?

It disable the start up folder........to achieve this....is hidden from the user. thats why is needs 512 ramI don't really understand this faster boot up and shut down. I use LINUX and these are irrelevant, because I don't have to reboot because Windows had a faux pas. Once it's running, it stays running.

I guess fast boot up appeals to some people, but frankly, I don't get it.Well in regards to windows XP people would like things faster.

But the also like the compatibility of Windows.

As for as i have seen all the games i want to buy and have bought do not run on Linux so, Whats the point of it?

R0SS


Discussion

No Comment Found