Solve : Interesting 2003 article on P4 3Ghz socket 478?

1.	Solve : Interesting 2003 article on P4 3Ghz socket 478?
Answer» Found this kind of funny: Quote The Pentium 4 3.0C uses the same FC-PGA2 form factor as previous Socket 478 processors, and while I love the IHS (Integrated Heat Spreader) the pins on the bottom are fragile and tend to get bent pretty easily. If possible, it would be very interesting to see chip manufacturers add a protective skirt around the outside edge to shield the pins from damage.... but maybe I'm just daydreaming here. At this link below from Jun 11 2003 I bet the author did not expect INTEL to bring out the LGA socket 775 3 years later after this article was written!!! http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=1403 I like to read old articles SOMETIMES to find stuff like this. I was looking up old info on a Pentium 4 3.0Ghz socket 478 to see how hard they could be overclocked since a friend of mine has one and asked the question of overclocking. Overclocking this CPU to us who have modern computers, we look down at from our powerful beast computers as a waste of time for a very small processing power gain since most of our systems benchmark these days 5x to 36x or greater in processing power to that of a Pentium 4 3Ghz. But to a user who has been happy sticking with their old trusty beast, an overclock to them has its pros even THOUGH to us with much faster systems we pretty much state its time to get a newer system that you dont need to overclock and even a low end processing power modern Celeron would beat the pants off of this CPU. Fact of the matter is that my friend doesnt need to overclock, but he wants to just to EXPERIENCE it and learn how to do it, and if the Pentium 4 lets out its secret smoke in the process it will FORCE him to have to get a newer computer anyways.

Answer»

Found this kind of funny:

Quote

The Pentium 4 3.0C uses the same FC-PGA2 form factor as previous Socket 478 processors, and while I love the IHS (Integrated Heat Spreader) the pins on the bottom are fragile and tend to get bent pretty easily. If possible, it would be very interesting to see chip manufacturers add a protective skirt around the outside edge to shield the pins from damage.... but maybe I'm just daydreaming here.

At this link below from Jun 11 2003

I bet the author did not expect INTEL to bring out the LGA socket 775 3 years later after this article was written!!!

http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=1403

I like to read old articles SOMETIMES to find stuff like this. I was looking up old info on a Pentium 4 3.0Ghz socket 478 to see how hard they could be overclocked since a friend of mine has one and asked the question of overclocking.

Overclocking this CPU to us who have modern computers, we look down at from our powerful beast computers as a waste of time for a very small processing power gain since most of our systems benchmark these days 5x to 36x or greater in processing power to that of a Pentium 4 3Ghz. But to a user who has been happy sticking with their old trusty beast, an overclock to them has its pros even THOUGH to us with much faster systems we pretty much state its time to get a newer system that you dont need to overclock and even a low end processing power modern Celeron would beat the pants off of this CPU. Fact of the matter is that my friend doesnt need to overclock, but he wants to just to EXPERIENCE it and learn how to do it, and if the Pentium 4 lets out its secret smoke in the process it will FORCE him to have to get a newer computer anyways.

Solve : Interesting 2003 article on P4 3Ghz socket 478?

Discussion

No Comment Found

Related InterviewSolutions

Reply to Comment