Explanation:

The first thing in my judgement we must do is to hold fast to constitutional methods of achieving our social and economic objectives When there was no way left for constitutional methods for achieving economic and social objectives, there was a GREAT deal of justification for unconstitutional methods. But where constitutional methods are open, there can be no justification for these unconstitutional methods. These methods are nothing but the Grammar of Anarchy and the sooner they are abandoned, the better for us. The second thing we must do is to abserve the caution which John Stuart Mill has given to all who are interested in the maintenance of democracy, namely, not "to lay their liberties at the feet of even a great man, ar to trust him with powers which enable him to subvert their institutions." There is nothing wrong in being grateful to great men who have rendered life-long services to the country, But there are limits to gratefulness. As has been WELL said by the Irish Patriot Daniel O'Connel, "No man can be grateful at the COST of his hanour, no woman can be grateful at the cost of her chastity and no nation can be grateful at the cost of its liberty. This caution is far more necessary in the case of india than in the case of any other country, for in india, Bhakti or what may be called the path of devotion or hero-worship, plays a partin its politics unequalled in magnitude by the part it plays in the politics of any other country in the world. Bhakti in RELIGION may be a ROAD to the salvation of the soul. But in politics, Bhakti or hero- worship is a sure road to degradation and to eventual dictatorship. A1) Global understanding Find out two most suitable statements to maintain the democracy according